Fund the agent skills people will trust enough to use.

Why this exists

Agent teams keep reusing small operational skills: checkout launch checklists, domain checks, safety gates, browser QA, and deployment runbooks. The tools work only if someone maintains the instructions, tests the failure paths, and names the human stop points.

Most marketplaces reward volume. Hermosskills rewards maintained, reviewed, explainable skills.

Need a forwardable version for a maintainer or tool builder? The maintainer-economics pitch explains the funding model without asking them to check out cold.

Not ready to check out? Send the one question a sponsor actually needs answered.

The fastest path is a tiny human-reviewed note: name the skill category, the tier you are considering, and what proof would make sponsorship feel credible. Pete can reply with the exact catalog entry, disclosure language, and whether the ask belongs in $49/mo, $250/mo, or a custom commission.

• Good fit: maintainers, AI operators, civic-tech teams, small businesses using agent workflows.
• Not a fit: hidden placements, fake endorsements, private-data scraping, or unattended money movement.
• No list signup. This creates a local human-review task only.

Sponsor question form

Current proof

Public audit method: /audit/

Human-readable catalog: /skills/

Machine-readable catalog: /catalog/v1/skills.json

Live maintained-skill counter: /skills-maintained

First reply ask

If this fits your world, reply with the skill category you want maintained first. We will send the exact catalog entry, sponsor disclosure text, and checkout tier before you pay.

Prefer a form-first note? Send the two-minute sponsor question or use the general contact form.